Laserfiche WebLink
MAR <br />13 <br />1995 <br />. BOOK 6 0 FADE 145 <br />side of <br />AIA and recreational facilities on the west side. <br />The overall density will not exceed the 6 units per acre <br />maximum for the area that is delineated. Director Keating <br />explained that staff has advised the applicant that they <br />could put in part of the development now at 3 units per acre <br />and then develop the area at 6 units per acre after the <br />moratorium is rescinded. <br />Chairman Lyons pointed out that apparently they are not <br />stopped dead in the water. <br />Attorney Caldwell noted that they would be gambling on <br />higher densities in that case, and Commissioner Scurlock <br />felt that if he were in such a position, he would not take <br />that risk, but would instead wait for another two months to <br />see what the traffic study will allow. <br />Attorney Caldwell believed that they have waited long <br />enough and pointed out that the site plan was submitted in <br />November. <br />Attorney Brandenburg explained that the County has no <br />better information with regard to the traffic analysis on <br />the barrier island other than what is contained in the HIMP <br />and the County has taken upon itself to hire a traffic <br />consultant to find out if those figures are accurate. The <br />analysis is referred to in the ordinance because there are <br />several terms which are used in the transportation plan that <br />are necessary to use in determing how many units can be <br />placed on a piece of property using the 3 units per acre <br />basis, such as what constitutes a developable acre of <br />property, trip generation rates and the allocation of the <br />trips. The County Attorney noted that the plan has been <br />available for anyone to look at for the last four or five <br />months. <br />In conclusion, Attorney Caldwell again urged the Board <br />to consider leaving this particular development out of the <br />moratorium. <br />22 <br />