4/3/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

APR 31995 Avenue, and it is a very important part of our transportation function. He agreed it would have been nice if they had given us the right-of-way, which.has happened in other cases, but he did not feel we should look for full reimbursement of the cost. Administrator Wright interjected that staff needs very specific instruction as to what the Board wishes them to look at. Commissioner Scurlock again emphasized that the applicant should be required to contribute towards the road improvement which benefited his property. He agreed this was a significant road for"the county, and he would not, therefore, expect the applicant to pay for the whole road. Commissioner Wodtke was concerned about tying this into the z oxo i ng. Attorney Brandenburg noted that the Board has a two-pronged approach in this instance as they are asking for redesignation of the Comprehensive Plan as well as rezoning, and the Comprehensive Plan does have traffic standards in it which probably could not have been met for this commercial development had 8th Street not been constructed. Commissioner Scurlock agreed that if the "Cu or "D" level of service was exceeded, they couldn't have developed their property and site plan approval would be based on their making a contribu- tion to remedy the situation. Commissioner Wodtke was of the opinion that Commissioner Bowman's suggestion in regard to squaring off the property is worth thinking about as one possible feasible alternative. Commissioner Bird noted even with a conceptual plan, the applicant still would have to have a pretty good idea of what they are going to put on the property, i.e., whether a Zayre's, a strip center, a car lot, etc., and Director Keating confirmed that staff would have to have a general idea of what the use would be. Commissioner Scurlock believed we have some general perameters as to what can be put on there. M 48 M M I