Laserfiche WebLink
APR 24 1985 <br />BOOK <br />C0 <br />1 <br />P,�cE i <br />FHA out <br />of that project by the end of this month, staff <br />is <br />recommending that we revise that agreement to a standard form <br />prepared by the County Attorney's office which will be utilized <br />for all of our consultants. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Bowman, that the Board approve the <br />revised agreement with Sippel., Masteller, <br />Lorenz & Hoover, Inc.; with the stipulation that <br />the standardized form will mandate an annual evaluation <br />of the relationship with the consultants even though we <br />have the ability to cancel every 30 days. <br />Director Pinto explained that policy has been to advise all <br />of our consultants that each job they do is assessed to determine <br />whether they will do another job for the County. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked if there were any rate changes in <br />this revision, and Director Pinto stated there were none. It was <br />part of an FHA project and there was a lump sum figure for the <br />SR -60 project. There is a breakdown of individual rates. Each <br />proposal that is made for a specific job is brought back to the <br />Board for a work authorization. He noted that the Board is not <br />authorizing any additional work at this time. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion <br />passed unanimously. <br />