6/5/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

jUN 5 1995 BOOK 61 FA,,F 111 funding 250 of the cost. He commented that actually the county has a direct cost and an indirect cost; the materials are a direct cost, and labor, equipment and engineering are indirect costs. Commissioner Wodtke asked a question re the previous petition paving project on 19th Ave. S.W. and wished to know if $16,000 is the total cost of that project. Director Davis confirmed that it is, noting that is just one block. Commissioner Wodtke felt if the County is paying 250 of the $24.00 a foot cost, that would leave $9.00 per foot for each property owner to pay, but Director Davis explained that some of the property involved is not private property ownership frontage, and, therefore, you can't equate front footage with lineal footage. Commissioner Wodtke discussed how costs have increased since we started the petition paving program and noted that it appears we now are making a charge for equipment, labor, engineering, etc., he hoped the cost doesn't get so high it discourages the property owners. Director Davis felt that our costs now are very representa- tive of what is actually going into the job, and we can justify them. Commissioner Bowman noted that all the projects differ in some respect, and Director Davis confirmed that all are designed separately, and shorter roads are a bit more expensive because of the costs of the mobilization of all the equipment, labor, etc. for the smaller job. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 85-59, providing for the paving and drainage improvements for Apple Way south of 12th Street; approved the preliminary assessment roll, which assesses 100% of the cost 70