My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/26/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
6/26/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:13 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:30:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/26/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUN 2 9 1995 <br />BOOK 61 t, -AGE: 01 <br />Commissioners Wodtke and Bowman agreed to include those <br />comments in their Motion. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion was <br />voted on and carried unanimously (4-0). <br />Permit_ Application 31-104842-4 (Walkway & Dock) <br />The Board then considered the permit for the walkway and <br />dock as a separate issue. <br />Commissioner Bird did not feel it was fair to penalize this <br />applicant just because staff anticipates more dock applications <br />in the near future. <br />Mr. Challacombe stressed that staff feels the entire impact <br />of multiple docking projects should be considered. <br />Administrator Wright suggested that the Board approve this <br />request today since it only involves one dock, and then put a <br />freeze on all dock projects. <br />Ed Schlitt, local realtor, was concerned about the mention <br />made of the Cain project, which is in this general area. He <br />advised that they have been working with the Town of Indian River <br />Shores and the Jungle Trail Committee in getting the road <br />alignment settled and it was his understanding that these.dock' <br />facilities already were approved by the State agencies. <br />Mr. Challacombe explained that the County Commission is now <br />reviewing all DER and Army Corps permits, while previously these <br />were taken to the Planning & Zoning Commission, and they had no <br />objections nor did the staff, other than the cumulative impact. <br />Mr. Schlitt was under the impression that no one had any <br />objection to that particular permitting and stressed that this <br />was the first he had heard that there might be some objection. <br />He wished to be advised on how to proceed in plans for their <br />development since the river is very important to their <br />development; they are not building any homes on the ocean. Mr. <br />Schlitt further noted that significant monies have been spent on <br />39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.