Laserfiche WebLink
this proj.ect and hoped that the manatee study would not delay <br />their plans. <br />Chairman Lyons emphasized that the Regional Planning Council <br />is very concerned about what this river can stand in the way of <br />docks, etc., and believed that at some point it is going to be <br />saturated. <br />Mr. Challacombe emphasized that in the recommendation staff <br />did not offer any major objections to this project or to the Can <br />project. Staff did feel, however, that the manatee issue should <br />be presented. <br />Attorney Brandenburg pointed out that the new law requires <br />the County to adopt a marina siting policy in the Comp Plan, <br />which he felt is really the area to address the cumulative impact <br />of all the dockage in the river by indicating in the criteria how <br />docks are to be placed and how many there will be. <br />Mrs. Stanbridge preferred that the dock issue be addressed <br />administratively though the controls provided within the County's <br />site plan process. <br />Commissioner Bowman felt that we should file an objection <br />stating that the docks are not in conformance with our County <br />ordinances, but Attorney Brandenburg advised that the docks are <br />an allowable use on this site provided the owner obtains <br />necessary approvals from the County. However, they have not <br />received site plan approval as yet. He noted that staff's memo <br />includes those comments. <br />Art Challacombe reviewed the following comments that staff <br />has recommended be transmitted to the DER with respect to the <br />docks: <br />1) That the docks require County site plan approval and that <br />they must be accessory uses to a primary structure; <br />2) That the DER consider the navigational aspects; and <br />3) That the potential impact on the manatee be considered. <br />40 <br />BOOK Pg,F.� <br />