7/10/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

M Planner Shearer stressed the need to funnel some of the traffic to collector roads before it goes to SR A -1-A. He noted that while they want to consolidate the traffic, they also want to keep as much of it as possible off of Jungle Trail; they, therefore, are recommending part of Jungle Trail be paved, but not the part along the river which is considered scenic. A Vice Chairman Scurlock asked whether the Scenic Trails Committee is aware of this, and Planner Shearer confirmed that they are. Vice Chairman Scurlock emphasized that he would not want property cut up in this process so that it is unusable, and Planner Shearer believed one parcel is split, but it is a good sized parcel. He pointed out that the map establishes a general corridor, but not exact right-of-way. Discussion ensued regarding who builds the roads and maintains them, where the money comes from, etc., and Director Keating stated they would be County roads; we would build and maintain them; and a collector roads impact fee could be used to build them. Commissioner Bird wished to know how the impact fee would apply to those who wish to develop and are ready to go, but none of the collector road is in. The County Attorney clarified that if a developer wished to build his project in an area which did not have the necessary collector road, his project would be considered premature, and the County could advise him that he could not obtain site plan approval until the road was built whether he paid impact fees or not. The developer would have the choice of either sitting back and waiting until the County built the road or could come to the County and help pay for or pay for all of the cost of building the road. He then would be able to move ahead with his site plan approval and also would get credit against his impact fees for whatever he contributed towards building the collector road. The only question unanswered is the question of a refund to the 35 JUL 101 BOOK PACE 447