8/21/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

rr__ -7 AUG 211985 BOOK F,10E O56 The Developer has proposed the following: 1) To contribute all design engineering and the approximately $77,000 for offsite road improvements prior to any Certificate of Occupancy being issued. The County would bid the construc- tion. Plans should be complete on August 31, 1985. 2) To fund a Patrol officer to direct traffic at the SR 60 access until Kings Highway widening is complete. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS In analyzing the above requests, staff presents the following potential problems: 1) The Florida DOT has not yet permitted the eastbound left turn lane along SR60. The Sept 28, 1984 letter (copy attached, Exhibit 2) from George Denti, DOT, to Ryanwood Shopping Center indicates that the Proposed left turn lane warrants research to determine the impact on SR 60. 2) Permitting and Utility Relocation for the Kings Highway work has not been accomplished. It is doubtful that this can be accomplished within 60 days. 3) _Signalization Modifications at SR 60 and Kings Highway may not be __.__... completed prior to- the widening dening work beginning. This may result in teMporary signal pole installation to allow road work to occur. Delivery dates for signal poles is usually somewhat long (3-6 months). It is recaimended that this request be approved contingent upon: 1) The Developer's Engineer securing all DOT permits by October 15, 1985. 2) The Developer's Engineer personally work with all utility companies having utilities .in the right-of-ways effected so that utility relocation can occur prior to Oct. 15, 1985. 3) The Developer's Engineer fast tract signal modifications including immediate acquisition of 4 signal poles. 4) The developer arrange to provide and fund a Patrol Officer at the SR 60 connection. Beginning at the opening of the first store until all improvements are complete. Public Works Director Jim Davis reviewed the developers request for a Certificate of Occupancy prior to road improvements being made on Kings Highway, which were agreed upon at site plan approval in June, 1984. Vice Chairman Scurlock understood that our decision delayed the project and now we are looking for something that is equitable for the developer, but he did not feel the backup material explained adequately whether the developer is requesting a C.O. prior to completing all the other on-site improvements or just the road improvements on Kings Highway. Administrator Davis stated that staff's recommendation deals only with the roadway, and Director Davis reported that the 59