Laserfiche WebLink
M <br />Senior Vice President of the development company has stated that <br />all on-site improvements will be completed - parking lot, <br />drainage, buildings, landscaping, etc. - and the only request <br />they are making is that they would like to pull C.O.s on units <br />prior to Kings Highway being widened to five lanes. <br />Vice Chairman Scurlock stated he would not have a problem <br />with that, but if they are talking about completing only three <br />buildings and not making all of the improvements for all of the <br />other buildings, that is another problem. He wished it to be <br />made very clear that the only waiver will be the road improvement <br />above and beyond what was originally requested. <br />Commissioner Wodtke noted that there is a letter written by <br />Public Works Director Davis to the Transportation Planning <br />Committee on September 6, 1984, at which time the decision was <br />made to five lane and do the additional intersection <br />improvements, and this was a year ago. Although we did change <br />the situation because the county decided we wanted to do some <br />additional improvements - what affect did that have on the <br />completion? Commissioner Wodtke felt it seems the developer <br />might not have even been able to do what they originally said <br />they were going to do within the same timeframe. If the County <br />caused a delay because of wanting to do some additional <br />improvements, then he felt we need to make it a consideration <br />because that would not set a precedent. However, since the <br />developer agreed to do the engineering back in September of 1984, <br />he wished to know if it is our fault that the engineering has <br />just been completed 12 months later, and Director Davis stated he <br />did not feel that it was. <br />Commissioner Wodtke did not see in that case how we could <br />legitimately say no to owners of other commercial developments <br />who request a C.O. prior to road improvements being made. He <br />felt that if it was the County's fault that caused the delay, <br />that would be one thing, but he didn't want to set a precedent <br />for similar requests from developers in the future. Furthermore, <br />60 <br />AUG 211985 BOOK <br />