9/11/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r SEP 111985 I B00K PAGE 4 on July 11, 1985. Subsequently, the staff completed its review of the revised site plan and transmitted comments to the developer and his engineer. Three issues must be addressed to adequately assess the status of the project. These are: (1) the availability of utilities to service the project; (2) the status of the revised site plan; and (3) the level of construction activity maintained on site in the last six months. Each of these will be considered separately. Utilities On July 11, 1985, the staff received copies of agreements between Gordon Nutt and Sea Oaks Devel- opment Company relating to the provision of utility services to the Sea Oaks Hotel project. In that correspondence, Mr. Nutt's attorney indicated that developer agreements with North Beach Water Company and Sea Oaks Development Company are currently being finalized. The utility agreement submitted by the developer references a developer agreement to be executed between the developer and North Beach Water Compa- ny. The existing agreement, however, does commit the Sea Oaks Development Company to provide the developer with both water and wastewater service exceeding the needs of the proposed hotel. The agreement also requires the Sea Oaks Development Company to extend water distribution and wastewater collection systems to the hotel site, and it specifies both costs and timeframes. Based upon these agreements, then, it appears that adequate provisions for utilities have been made for the project. Site Plan Staff comments on the revised site plan were not transmitted to the applicant until recently. Most of the comments were only minor in nature, since the developer had agreed to most of the major site changes prior to submittal of the revised plan. The remaining substantive item involves dedication of right-of-way. Once this issue is adequately addressed, the revised site plan can be approved. °. Hotel Construction 'Since the February 20, 1985 meeting of the Board of County Commissioners, the staff has monitored construction activity at the project site. During this time, construction has been maintained on the villa building which was under construction then. According to Building Department records, three inspections have been -made of the subject project in 1985. Two inspections involved the perimeter beam and were conducted in March and April; the other was a framing inspection conducted on July 12, 1985. In addition, an electrical permit was issued for the project in August of 1985. Based upon the staff inspection, it appears that progress is being made on the one structure under 34