9/11/1985 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Commissioner Wodtke felt that did not make any difference as they might want to have it at some time, and Public Works Director Jim Davis agreed it would be beneficial. Director Keating felt then that the best thing would be to refer it back to staff or the Planning & Zoning Commission to see if a marginal access road is needed, but allow the access to U.S. #1. Chairman Lyons opened the Public Hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. Darrell McQueen of Lloyd & Associates stressed that they submitted the site plan three or four times and the way the building is set in this site plan does not make provisions for a limited access in front of this property. The corner of the building is about 10 feet off the property line now and the limited access required by staff might harm the owner. He felt that the extensive site plan review process results in the Planning Dept. actually designing a site. Mr. McQueen suggested that if the Board wants it to be more restrictive, they should change the ordinance, as their site plan conforms to the present ordinances. Commissioner Bird asked if we have any policy for the future possibility of a marginal access road parallel to U.S. #1, and if we have such a policy, have we applied it uniformly to all site plans. Director Keating stated that we have, but this site plan was denied because we are applying the policy that they have to connect to the marginal access road that is there, which is Old Dixie. He repeated that his suggestion would be to send it back to the Planning & Zoning Commission to determine whether or not a marginal access road is needed in this part of U.S. #1. Commissioner Bird hoped we would make the decision for that entire corridor as we are doing on south U. S. #1. Director Keating explained that Old Dixie would be the access for properties facing both U.S. #1 and Old Dixie. 47 ��'� FP .� BOOK fGE m� t.