9/11/1985 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

L� Director Keating advised that it could be approved subject to the discretion of staff to approve the reconfiguration of site plan to provide for a marginal access road. Director Davis advised that we normally require a 40 -ft. setback to accommodate both aisles for the 2 -way traffic movement and some accessory parking for the site, if that is the desire of the planner. That 40 feet includes the driveway connection, for which the developer provides the paving up to the property line. There have been cases where a portion of it has been paved and then the owner of the site beyond it has paved the physical connection to their pavement. It has been done both ways. Attorney Mann suggested that Mr. McQueen take some time .to see if that is possible up there, and if it can be done, they would submit it as a minor change instead of having to go through the whole site plan process again. Chairman Lyons asked if Attorney Mann would agree to this being at the discretion of the Planning Director. Attorney Mann expressed her reluctance to commit to it without knowing if it were possible or not. Chairman Lyons believed that if Attorney Mann indicated a willingness to see if this can be done, we might be able to settle the matter. Attorney Mann felt it would be more reasonable to wait until the time the other parcel is going to be connected to it rather than to put it in now and maintain it for a number of years. Chairman Lyons agreed that was reasonable and could be worked out. Mr. McQueen pointed out the the setback requirements would put the location of this building almost behind other buildings along that corridor, and he felt that the County has devalued this piece of property tremendously. Commissioner Bird believed we have to start somewhere because we cannot continue to make these mistakes. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by 49 SEP 1 8 1995 BOOK F�� J I