10/16/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Commissioner Scurlock felt that what Chairman Lyons is saying is that we have a lot of people out there who are tired of not knowing what is going to happen to them and want to know whether or not there is going to be a shopping center in back of a them and get on with it. That is what he has got from the residents in the area, and Chairman Lyons stated that was his feeling also and wondered what the best vehicle would be. Mr. Shearer clarified that he was not recommending that the Board necessarily postpone it, but if they do, staff would like to do it on December 4th. Attorney Clem stated he had no objection as they want to get it done also and repeated that they are not here to represent that they are going to get everybody lined up -- they might and they might not -- but they would like to have an opportunity to present their plans to them. He reported that the residents had a meeting on Monday evening of this week, but there just has not been enough time to get everything pulled together. If the meeting is to be December 4th, then it is December 4th. it. Mr. Shearer suggested that the developer could reschedule Commissioner Wodtke understood in that case the applicant has the option to withdraw the request rather than to postpone it. Commissioner Scurlock did not feel that we had any choice because the option for the applicant is to withdraw his request and then he can resubmit it at the next time period. Mr. Shearer explained that the Board can hear it today as scheduled or postpone it until December 4th when the new Comp Plan land use amendment applications come through. Another alternative would be for the applicant to withdraw the request, and the fourth alternative would be for them to come back in January and reapply. Attorney Vitunac explained that his office has been seeing some restrictive covenants prepared by Attorney Clem's office and 40 OCT 16 7985 62 FADE 3