Laserfiche WebLink
- ® M <br />about an extremely complicated D.R.I. with a 10 year development <br />plan, and we need a schedule to keep track of who monitors all <br />this. <br />Director Keating advised that staff did start developing a <br />sort of flow chart, and we do have a graph with a sequence of <br />events; he believed we will want to have an annual review. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt this should be part of the <br />Development Order, and Planner Boling believed it was addressed <br />in the timing conditions of the Order. <br />Director Keating noted that the reason staff didn't prepare <br />a detailed check list is that they did not know what would be <br />approved in the Development Order. <br />Chairman Lyons believed we are working with.a moving target; <br />the proposal that went to Planning & Zoning was different from <br />that which went to the Regional Planning Council, and he believed <br />the project will continue to change in the future. He still <br />wondered if it is timely to consider this Order as it will end up <br />different than it is on paper right now. <br />Director Keating confirmed a different plan was presented <br />and it is somewhat confusing. The Development Order is really a <br />set of conditions that modifies the original proposal, and that <br />is the way staff recommends the Board look at it today. <br />It was agreed to move on and address the proposed Comprehen- <br />sive Plan amendments and zoning changes at this time, and Chief <br />Planner Shearer reviewed the following memo: <br />49 <br />OCT 23 1985 <br />BOOK 62 RASE O& <br />