Laserfiche WebLink
M M <br />Director Davis noted that our contract with Barton-Aschman <br />spells out a certain amount of meetings and we need to figure out <br />where we are at this point. If we are going to request them to <br />meet with each municipality, he felt we ought to compensate them <br />for what the contract calls for and requested permission to work <br />with them in that regard. He advised that he would keep the <br />Board posted if there are any changes in compensation. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt there wasn't any question that we <br />do want the consultants involved in the city hearings. <br />Commissioner Bird stressed that was the reason he suggested <br />the cities hold their public hearings at the same time the <br />consultants visit so that everybody gets the information at once. <br />Commissioner Scurlock realized that while he was familiar <br />with the road impact fee issue because he chairs the <br />Transportation Planning Committee, undoubtedly the other <br />Commissioners have a lot of questions they want to ask. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked several questions about financing <br />bridges, and Dr. Nicholas explained that bridges are not <br />allocated to any particular district. Each district would pay a <br />certain percentage -- it just depends on the new trips generated <br />from that district. <br />Commissioner Wodtke questioned the number of trips projected <br />for medical visits and why it is assumed that medical trips would <br />be incoming when many doctors are relocating further west and <br />north. He felt that many doctors will wonder why that particular <br />land use category is charged with such a high number of trips. <br />Dr. Nicholas explained that those trips are figured both <br />ways -- coming and going. <br />13 <br />OCT 3 0 1985 <br />BOOK <br />62 FA,E 583 <br />