Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK 62 PAr,E 682 <br />CONTRACT W/CAMP DRESSER & McKEE FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES (SOLID <br />WASTE <br />The Board reviewed the following staff memo: <br />TO: BOARD OF COUNTY DATE: OCTOBER 30, 1985 <br />COMMISSIONERS <br />THRU: TERRANCE G. PINT <br />FROM: JEFFREY K: BARTON� <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />SUBJECT: CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING <br />SERVICES (SOLID WASTE) <br />WITH CAMP DRESSER & McKEE <br />INC. <br />On July 10, 1985, the Board of County Commissioners approved the recommenda- <br />tion of the Selection Committee dated June 24, 1985 (attached) and <br />authorized Staff to bring back to the Board a proposed contact. Attached <br />is the proposed contract for services by Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. Staff <br />has reviewed the proposed contract which can be divided into three (3) <br />areas: <br />1. Solid Waste Management Master Plan; <br />2. Sludge Management Feasibility Study; <br />3. Septage Feasibility Study. <br />The total fee for these proposed services is not to exceed $126,860.00. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the con- <br />tract and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract on behalf of Indian <br />River County. <br />Commissioner Scurlock stressed that dealing with solid waste <br />will not be inexpensive; the proposed fee is a negotiated amount <br />for just the engineering services, and they started out <br />considerably higher. He believed when the figures come out of <br />the Master Plan, they will be staggering; this will not be a <br />situation.any longer where just burying the solid waste is going <br />to be acceptable, and we will have to look at alternate methods <br />of reuse, etc. <br />Commissioner Bird inquired if we could at least recommend to <br />the engineers that they explore the possibility of working with <br />St. Lucie County regarding a combined facility. <br />56 <br />