Laserfiche WebLink
800K ��� Ft4�f <br />agriculture butts up against people; and the low intensity of the <br />use could be an asset. Of course, there should be provision for <br />the best possible kind of a buffer. It seems, however, this <br />might be premature because of the questions that need to be <br />answered, and he felt the proposal is not concrete enough at this <br />point. <br />Commissioner Bowman believed that 1-95 is the best buffer we <br />have. <br />Chairman Lyons advised that he planned to vote for the <br />denial because he has been convinced this is good agricultural <br />land and he does oppose unnecessary encroachment on such lands. <br />Commissioner Bird noted that he had stated the same concerns <br />earlier. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION on the <br />Motion to deny. It was voted on and carried <br />unanimously. <br />Attorney Caldwell stated that it appears one of the.Board's <br />main concerns was drainage, but he was not clear as to whether <br />the agricultural use is something that was desired on SR 60 or <br />not. <br />Chairman Lyons explained that his vote was based on the fact <br />that this was established as agricultural land, and accordingly, <br />he will oppose residential development on SR 60 further west than <br />we have it now. <br />Commissioner Bird stated that he basically feels it is <br />premature to create a residential area that far west in the midst <br />of prime agricultural land, and Commissioner Bowman confirmed <br />that she felt the same. <br />Attorney Caldwell had a question in regard to proceeding <br />with a D.R.I. and wished to know if the rezoning were denied, <br />would they then have a two year wait? Staff advised that it <br />would be one year from when they first applied, or next July. <br />54 <br />J <br />