My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/18/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
12/18/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:32 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 11:22:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/18/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DEC 18 <br />BOOK <br />bid. There would be an advantage, of course, to having the same <br />subs throughout the project. <br />Administrator Wright believed we should agree jointly with <br />the architect on the cost estimator because it will get down to <br />the architect and us negotiating with the contractor, and he felt <br />the Board would feel more comfortable if we both agree on an <br />estimator. <br />Commissioner Wodtke felt having an independent cost estimate <br />done separately from the architectural firm would make everyone <br />feel more comfortable. <br />Commissioner Scurlock did not see where we are saving the <br />time because you can't actually get the final price until the <br />architect has completed all of his plans and drawings. <br />Mr. Bail brought up the possibility of going on a phased <br />basis, i.e., the foundation could be designed before the rest of <br />the building design is completed. If you are working on a cost <br />plus basis, you can negotiate a fee with the contractor, and he <br />could proceed to get quotes and estimates and perhaps let the <br />foundation contract before the plans are entirely completed. <br />Discussion ensued about the need to expedite construction <br />and try to get these buildings completed at the same time so we <br />don't have to split up staffing with a temporary situation at the <br />old jail, and Administrator Wright spoke of the coordination <br />problems that would be involved with having two separate <br />contractors on the same site; he felt it would be preferable to <br />stay with the present contractor if he is reasonable. <br />Discussion continued re the problems that would be involved <br />re coordination, staffing, movement of laundry from one building <br />to another, feeding inmates, etc., and it was also noted that we <br />do not want to prolong the finish date of the first phase. <br />Mr. Bail assured the Board that they will move as quickly as <br />possible and stated he would like to come back in a few weeks <br />with some recommendations. <br />122 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.