My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/22/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
1/22/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:00 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 11:26:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/22/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
types of homes so that there won't be a proliferation of homes in <br />one area. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked how rectories and convents were <br />treated, and Director Keating explained that they are considered <br />a normal, customary use by a church, but pointed out that <br />churches require a special exception use. <br />Commissioner Lyons raised the question of two neighboring <br />homes where one family has 12 natural children and fight all the <br />time and the other is an unmarried couple with three children a <br />piece from former marriages who get along just fine. How are we <br />going to tell them that one is acceptable and one is not. <br />Commissioner Wodtke explained that this ordinance goes back <br />to the language we had before it was changed in May, 1985, which <br />allowed only 4 unrelated people. <br />Chairman Scurlock raised the question of five young men or <br />women who go together to rent a large house and how we would <br />justify not allowing 5 unrelated persons when 4 is acceptable. <br />Commissioner Wodtke understood in that case they would have <br />to come in and get an administrative approval which gives us the <br />opportunity to review the situation. <br />Commissioner Bird felt that while it was almost impossible <br />to get an ordinance that addresses every situation, the majority <br />of homeowners in this county want some kind of restrictions or <br />protection with respect to having certain activities in their <br />neighborhoods. <br />Attorney Vitunac advised that the Code Enforcement Board <br />would enforce this ordinance, but Commissioner Lyons felt the <br />only thing we can enforce is the number of square feet required <br />for each person living in the house. He wondered why we are <br />considering this ordinance if there is no way to enforce it. <br />Director Keating agreed that the ordinance would be hard to <br />enforce, but at least it would provide a mechanism for resolving <br />complaints when it can be determined that the situation exists. <br />50 <br />JAN 2 2 1986 <br />BOOK 63 ,r,r 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.