My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/19/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
3/19/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:01 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 12:10:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/19/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 Boos 63 <br />revenues. He emphasized that there are absolutely no funds <br />except what is in the enterprise account. <br />Commissioner Lyons believed that if we more than double the <br />fees for a pickup load of less than 1 -ton, the trash just will <br />not get to the landfill. <br />Director Pinto felt if someone coming in with one ton has to <br />pay $16, it is hard to justify the person coming in with 1/2 ton <br />and paying only $3.00. <br />Chairman Scurlock suspected that if we go with the $8 for <br />less than one ton, it would push people into illegal dumping or <br />simply taking it to the transfer stations. <br />Director Pinto said the problem is that many small <br />businesses modify their pickup trucks and it is absolutely <br />unbelievable how much trash they can get on a 1/2 -ton pickup <br />truck. What they are suggesting is that everything gets weighed, <br />from 1 -ton up, but less than that would be a flat rate. <br />Commissioner Wodtke pointed out that we are talking about <br />closing just one cell at the Landfill, not the entire site. He <br />felt that it was very evident that we are going to reach a point <br />where we must do something else with our garbage than just <br />burying it and suggested something similar to the old stump dump <br />operation for handling yard cuttings, branches, clippings, etc. <br />Director Pinto stated that they are looking at every <br />alternative, and although he believed the stump dump might be a <br />good idea, the DER might not agree. We must face the fact that <br />regulations for landfills are just going to get tighter and <br />tighter. <br />Intergovernmental Relations Director Tommy Thomas pointed <br />out that we must continue to pick up refuse no matter what system <br />we go to. Everything that he has studied on this indicates a per <br />parcel charge would be a much better answer because we have a <br />tremendous number of parcels that pay absolutely nothing. This <br />is to the tune that it affects this year's general fund by over <br />$600,000 and next year that figure will probably increase to <br />21 <br />M <br />M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.