My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/19/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
3/19/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:01 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 12:10:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/19/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8cox 63 920 <br />problems and spent a substantial amount of money for drainfields, <br />etc., in addition to spending another $12,000 to install a septic <br />system and lift station. Further, they donated 25 ft. of <br />right-of-way for a street that never has been built. Now the <br />members are objecting to escrowing money to pay for a sidewalk <br />that they feel will never be built. <br />Commissioner Lyons pointed out that their drainage taxes are <br />levied by the Indian River Farms Drainage District, not the <br />County. <br />Commissioner Bird felt certain that a bike path will be <br />built along 43rd Avenue because of the proximity of Citrus <br />Elementary School. While he understood the concerns of the Moose <br />membership, he pointed out that by applying for a permit to add <br />on to their building, they are under the requirements of the new <br />building codes with respect to sidewalks. <br />Commissioner Wodtke felt that if the sidewalk needs to be <br />built now, let's do it on an assessment instead of escrowing the <br />money. He also questioned the advisability of a minor site plan <br />triggering a sidewalk and suggested that the Board revisit those <br />requirements. <br />Mr. Franks pointed out that 43rd Avenue is only 55 feet <br />wide. <br />Chairman Scurlock also was concerned about our overall <br />policy of requiring a sidewalk or bike path on minor site plans <br />because he felt that in some cases it actually discourages people <br />from improving their property. <br />Director Keating advised that the Planning Department is <br />looking at several things that may resolve some of these issues, <br />and are also looking for alternatives for funding bike paths and <br />sidewalks. <br />Chairman Scurlock was under the impression that when he <br />voted for the Subdivision Ordinance that sidewalks were just <br />going to be built on the frontage of larger roads, not along the <br />roads within the subdivision. He agreed that this issue should <br />35 <br />� � r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.