Laserfiche WebLink
development density transfers. Our ordinance states that if a <br />developer donates right-of-way to the County, then his <br />development density can be based upon the gross acreage of his <br />parcel prior to the right-of-way donation. In this case, Mr. <br />Baker, who is representing Patrician Enterprises, has stated that <br />they want to exercise a combination of impact fee credit and <br />development density transfers. Staff has reviewed our ordinances <br />and the County Attorney's office has indicated those options are <br />available. <br />Chairman Scurlock felt that by using this approach, they <br />actually would end up with a little less density, rather than if <br />they were required to stack the additional units. This way it is <br />split, but it can happen only if there is a donation. He met <br />with Mr. Baker of Patrician Enterprises and they have agreed to <br />this. The only thing we must make clear is that they cannot get <br />a density transfer and an impact fee credit at the same time. It <br />is one or the other. You can split it, but you cannot get <br />double. <br />Director Davis asked for the Board's concurrence with the <br />options as set forth in the letter to Attorney Steve Henderson. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0, <br />Commissioners Lyons and Bird being absent) approved <br />the stipulations and the options to the right-of-way <br />being donated by Patrician Enterprises based upon the <br />letter to Attorney Steve Henderson dated March 21, <br />1986. <br />Director Davis next reviewed the Schacht parcels, and <br />explained that Mr. Schacht is a resident of Puerto Rico who has <br />indicated he would be willing to donate the right-of-way for <br />Indian River Boulevard and 8th Street as long as the County <br />provides a resolution similar to the one on the Tanen property. <br />45 <br />MAR 2 6 1986 Boa 6 U 4 09,4: <br />