Laserfiche WebLink
APR -16 1986 BOOK 64 Fri lu <br />they have the ability to design and install a system as well as <br />Toro; in this case, however, he did feel they underdesigned their <br />system a bit in order to try and come in a little lower. He felt <br />they could redesign and put out the same amount of water, but <br />believed they would have to upgrade. <br />Commissioner Lyons noted that he is beginning to give a bit. <br />Since Rain Bird didn't show up today and they knew what the <br />attitude of the architect was, he felt possibly there is nothing <br />they can add. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />Administrator Wright apologized to the Board and assured <br />them he would try to get the information to them sooner in the <br />future. The Board generally agreed the architect could have <br />handled this a little better. <br />GOLF COURSE - ARCHITECT FOR CLUBHOUSE, ETC. <br />General Services Director Dean informed the Board that on <br />the 10th of April he and Commissioner Bird met with architect <br />Charles Block to negotiate a fee to design..a clubhouse, cart <br />shed, etc. Mr. Block informed them that the normal curve for <br />this type of design work was 80, but he was interested in helping <br />the county with the project, and, therefore, negotiated a 6% fee <br />for the basic design. He did include a stipulation that any work <br />outside the basic design work would be at $50 an hour, which is <br />quite standard. It was made clear to Mr. Block that the club- <br />house and all buildings would have to be designed within our <br />budget. <br />Administrator Wright noted that staff will ask the Board to <br />make a decision on the type of management on May 7th, and this <br />will have a direct impact on the size of the clubhouse. Mr. <br />Block would not actually start any design work on this building <br />69 <br />