Laserfiche WebLink
M <br />Administrator Wright inquired about the effect of this in <br />Indian River Heights, for instance, and Public Works Director <br />Davis advised that in that area we have definitive back lot <br />drainage, and it is simply a matter of sloping to get to the <br />swale. He emphasized it is not the intent to get into something <br />costly, but we do want people to think about drainage when they <br />design their house. <br />Commissioner Bird did not want this to require hiring an <br />engineering firm or anything that will increase the cost of the <br />homes considerably. <br />Commissioner Wodtke wondered if we may not need some <br />flexibility with the standard of the 10 year 24 hour storm as he <br />felt, in some cases, people may not be able to retain 7.5" of <br />water on their site. <br />Administrator Wright asked about areas where we might have a <br />problem with this standard, and Director Davis felt some of the <br />problem would be in unplatted metes and bounds subdivisions with <br />no rear lot easement. He pointed out that while the rainfall in <br />the 10 year 24 hour storm may be 7" or so, the runoff from the <br />lot is not that much. but he felt we could relax that require- <br />ment if desired. <br />Commissioner Wodtke felt possibly we should try it first and <br />see just how much problem it does create, and Vice Chairman Lyons <br />agreed. <br />Commissioner Bowman brought up the problem of the runoff <br />being legally routed off the site into a maintained drainage <br />system as she believed the water management districts are very <br />jealous of their ditches. <br />Vice Chairman Lyons asked if anyone wished to be heard. <br />Georgia Allen of Roseland confirmed"the.re are cases where <br />the requirements for elevation of new houses have caused <br />problems, and she agreed that people need some assurance their <br />yards will not be flooded. <br />It was determined no one else wished to be heard. <br />53 <br />Boa 64 PA,UE.510 <br />