My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/15/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
7/15/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:02 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 12:42:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/15/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUL 15 1966 <br />STATE OF FLORIDA <br />DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY <br />BOOK 65 PnE 04 -7 <br />A F F A I RS <br />2571 EXECUTIVE CENTER CIRCLE, EAST O TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32301 <br />BOB GRAHAM TOM LEWIS, JR. <br />Governor Secretary <br />June 3, 1987 <br />Cn <br />'0 G <br />Mr. Richard Sh �' <br />Chief, Long Rang�e� lanai"! �v <br />1840 25th Street4,>„� <br />Vero Beach, Floridar-:i3��a.' <br />Dear Mr. Shearer: <br />Pursuant to s.163.3184, Florida Statutes, the Department of <br />Community Affairs has reviewed Comprehensive Plan Amendment <br />applications submitted by Indian River County on March 26, 1986. <br />Our review has indicated that the amendments are consistent <br />with statutory requirements; however, several comments are <br />enclosed for your consideration. Comment from the Treasure Coast <br />Regional Planning Council are also enclosed for your <br />consideration. <br />It is requested that once the amendments are adopted, copies <br />be provided to the Department as required by s.163.3187(2), F.S. <br />If we can be of further assistance, please contact Mme. Ralph <br />Hook at (904) 487-4545. <br />Sincerely, <br />Robert F. Kessler, Chief <br />Bureau of Local Resource <br />Planning <br />COMMENTS ON.LAND USE AMENDMENTS <br />TO THE INDIAN RIVER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN <br />1. The request to redesignate 50 acres from agriculture (up to <br />.2 dwelling units/acre) to medium -density residential (up to <br />8 dwelling units/acre) proposed in LPA059 appears to be an <br />excessive density increase for an*area not served by potable <br />water and sewer facilities. Consideration should also be <br />given to limiting density under the flight path for the <br />approaches associated with the aerodrome airfield. <br />2. Although most staff analyses discussed traffic impacts <br />associated with request for density increases, there was no <br />discussion of the cumulative effects where more than one <br />amendment could effect the same roadway i.e., LPA058 and <br />LPA059. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.