7/29/1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Commissioner Bird believed if the current two OCR pieces were designated a neighborhood node, which is 3 acres, that would preclude expanding it further, but Planner Shearer pointed out that the Comprehensive Plan would prohibit a neighborhood node at this location because of the MXD immediately across the street. Discussion ensued as to just what a reasonable use of Parcels 1 and 2,would be with Attorney Quinn maintaining that the appropriate use is OCR. Chairman Scurlock noted that the Bank bought Parcel #3 and he did not know what they could do with that; possibly they could sell it back to Vista. He stated his personal preference would be to leave Parcels i and 2 OCR and Parcels 3 and 4 RM -10 which is what they currently are. Attorney Henderson emphasized that Parcels 1 and 2, which contain 3.7 acres, are OCR because of an existing use. Their proposal is that the Board allow them the smallest amount of commercial consistent with the original plans of the developer and make that 3.7 acres CN, the most restricted commercial zone available, and they then will put offices on the parcels on the south side of Vista Royale Blvd, which no one seems to have much trouble with. If Parcels 3 and 4 are left RM -10, he felt the Commission is condemning the property to be a buffer area. The Chairman noted that is just Attorney Henderson's opinion, and he did not agree. Sam Alia, Chairman of Vista Royale Property Protection Com- mittee, was surprised no one knew Barnett Bank does not intend to build a branch bank on their parcel, but that they have a retainer for a Do -nut Shop. Fred West of Barnett Bank informed the Board that he had been asked to have that contract withdrawn sometime ago. He also pointed out that OCR doesn't allow a Do -nut Shop; so, he felt that should alleviate any fears in that regard. It was determined that no one else wished to be heard. 33 JUL 2 9 1998 -So L, 800 M f E 255