My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/9/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
9/9/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:19 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 12:56:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/09/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Wodtke raised a question about the wisdom of <br />continuing to hold the Commission meetings on Tuesdays rather <br />than Wednesdays. <br />In discussion it was noted that the majority of conventions, <br />seminars, etc., begin on a Wednesday, and it was generally agreed <br />to stay with the Tuesday meetings and to skip the Commission <br />meeting of November 11th. <br />SANDRIDGE GOLF COURSE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE <br />Planning & Development Director Keating informed the Board <br />that he, Public Works Director Davis, Traffic Engineer Michael <br />Orr, and Chief Planner Shearer, met and discussed the impact fees <br />for golf courses, and they have come up with a couple of fees per <br />parking space based on the two trip generation rates of 1.8 and <br />5.3, which were the low and the average rates in the ITE Manual.' <br />They all felt, however, that the: best method to approach thi-s <br />would be to put a traffic counter out at Sebastian Municipal Golf <br />Course which is quite comparable and then hopefully come back <br />with a better fee in a week. <br />Chairman Scurlock felt our discussion had been that we were <br />going to take the low end, and Commissioner Bird thought we were <br />going to go by traffic spaces rather than traffic count. It was <br />explained there is a multiplier times the parking space based on <br />traffic generation which must be determined. <br />Acting Administrator Thomas stated that the real problem is <br />that this matter was not addressed properly to begin with. He <br />felt we should move ahead on determining these fees because there <br />will be other golf courses built in the area and what we come up <br />with should be correct and reasonable. <br />Director Keating pointed out that it was the consultant's <br />opinion that we should structure the ordinance as we did, and <br />there were certain reasons to keep the number of land uses <br />limited. <br />39 <br />BOOK 65 PAGE 6,59 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.