My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/23/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
9/23/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:19 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:03:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/23/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- M <br />coordination phase in the contract to cover getting all the <br />required agencies involved and to basically set the ground rules <br />as to what type of mitigation we have to do in the wetlands area <br />and what design changes, if any, we are going to have to do. <br />That is scheduled to take about 3 months; then we will get into <br />the preliminary and final design stages and hope to be in <br />construction within a year. <br />Chairman Scurlock expressed his concern about the funding of <br />these projects as the impact fees come in. He noted that we have <br />some large projects within specific zones, such as Indian River <br />Boulevard or a bridge, for instance...Impact fees may come in <br />slowly or quickly and they may only be used in specific areas; <br />therefore, if we build a large project out of gas tax or some <br />other revenue source, he wanted to be sure we have a process <br />where we can do a borrowing situation so that when future impact <br />fees come in, they can repay those monies. He believed this is a <br />concern because at the beginning we will have a shortfall. <br />OMB Director Baird noted this particular project was <br />budgeted for the new year and has a fund of its own, but it was <br />noted that the question is where is the anticipated funding <br />source for the overall project. <br />Chairman Scurlock continued to discuss using gas tax funds <br />in the initial stages but only as a borrowing tool, and OMB <br />Director Baird advised that we segregate all impact fees <br />collected in the certain zone where they are collected and know <br />our balance at all times. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked how much of this project would <br />reasonably be paid if we had the impact fees in hand, and <br />Director Davis stated that we could pay 100% of this project with <br />impact fees; it qualified for that type of a funding program. <br />Commissioner Bowman asked if we can actually project that <br />the impact fees will be sufficient to pay for the complete <br />project, and Director Davis noted that we could bond the project <br />23 <br />Book 65 FmH 8?3 <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.