Laserfiche WebLink
t <br />DISCUSSION RE 10TH COURT S.W. <br />BOOK u�?' <br />The Board reviewed letter received from the Oslo Concerned <br />Citizens League: <br />September 23, 1986 <br />To; Board of County Commissioners <br />Indian River County, FL <br />Dear Sirs; <br />The Oslo Concerned Citizen League feels that it is necessary to request <br />another hearing on the outcome of 10th Court, S.W. All of the requirements <br />for the petition have been fulfilled by our end but there still seems to be <br />a delay on the county's behalf. We would like to clear up this matter as soon <br />as possible. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. <br />q�� <br />erely,T. Wiggins, <br />President <br />Assistant County Attorney Wilson noted that normally in our <br />petition paving program the County pays 25% and the residents pay <br />75%, but in this particular case, the County agreed to pay 750. <br />We have gotten deeds from most of the people, giving us the <br />necessary right-of-way, but the main problem is that we have one <br />resident who is unalterably opposed to the road being built and <br />paved, and the only way to acquire that property would be through <br />condemnation. This woman has a home on a lot which is 70' deep; <br />we need 201, which would leave her doorstep about 5' from the <br />road right-of-way. Attorney Wilson did not think there is any <br />other way to put the road through this area, and the problem with <br />condemnation is the cost involved. The Attorney's office, <br />therefore, needs to know if the Board is willing to include that <br />cost as part of the petition paving, and also, Attorney Wilson <br />was not'sure we can show the.public necessity for the taking of <br />94 <br />