My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/9/1986
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1986
>
12/9/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:53:20 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:19:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/09/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F 77 <br />incorporated in the zoning code to allow group homes to have more <br />units than would normally be allowed by zoning district regu- <br />lations. This provision was established to reflect the lower <br />intensity of group homes, e.g. smaller units, fewer vehicle trips, <br />and fewer persons per unit. The units were anticipated- to be <br />small and the clientele dependent on the facility. <br />According to the residential center group home density provision, <br />the five acres proposed for the dormitory use could accommodate <br />the following number of students [Sec. 25.1(F)(d)(3)]. <br />6 units per acre (RM -6) x 2.0 persons per dwelling unit x 11 <br />the normal density = 18 people per acre. <br />18 people x 5 acres = 90 people. <br />. <br />The maximum number of students for the proposed dormitory <br />therefore totals ninety. <br />The site plan submittal identifies two phases, each consisting of <br />an identical dormitory structure that provides accommodations for <br />72 students. Since the special exception density provision <br />permits a maximum of 90. people on the subject 5 acre tract and the <br />inclusion of the second phase provides for total site development <br />to serve 144 students, the second phase must be deleted from the <br />site plan so that the plan provides for no more than 90 people. <br />Although the special exception process allows the Board of County <br />Commissioners to impose any additional conditions to ensure <br />compatibility of the proposed use with surrounding property, the <br />staff does not recommend the imposition of any special conditions <br />in this case. <br />Appeal of Site Plan Approval <br />The Planning and Development Division is appealing the action of <br />the Planning and Zoning Commission to the Board of County Commis- <br />sioners for the following reasons: <br />1. The Indian River County Thoroughfare Plan identifies this <br />segment of 16th Street (Lundberg --Road) as a secondary collec- <br />- tor. The Indian River County Thoroughfare Plan is the <br />official standard for determining R.O.W. dedication [Sec. <br />23.3(d)(1)1; <br />2. The minimum R.O.W. width for a secondary collector is 80 feet <br />[Sec. 23.3 (d) (1) c] ; <br />3. The Indian River Farms Drainage District main relief canal <br />abuts the subject property to the south and the drainage <br />district, although willing to cooperate with the County, is <br />not willing to dedicate any of the existing width of canal <br />R.O.W. to the County for roadway purposes [Conversation <br />between drainage district engineer, Marvin Carter and staff <br />on November 24, 1986]; <br />4. The applicant is compensated for R.O.W. dedication through <br />either applying to the County for credit against traffic <br />impact fees or transferring the density from the strip of <br />R.O.W. to the remainder of the property; <br />5. In 1976 the Indian River Community College obtained a strip <br />of land 61.7 feet wide by 1330 feet long that connects the <br />present campus and dormitory site to Kings Highway. The <br />strip of land abuts the north edge of the canal R.O.W. and is <br />in alignment with the 80 feet of R.O.W. that County code <br />requires be dedicated; <br />56 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.