My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/6/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
1/6/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:17 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:24:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/06/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
are some items we may have to consider renting in the meantime. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously (4-0) <br />DISCUSSION RE TOURIST TAX <br />Attorney Vitunac noted that recently there have been some <br />articles in the local paper setting out opposing views between <br />the City of Vero Beach and the County over what the money <br />generated from a Tourist Tax would be used for. He believed this <br />problem may have been caused by misinformation from the state as <br />it appears, from an article in the last issue of Florida Trend, <br />that the state has been underestimating these revenues for all <br />the counties in the state. <br />Attorney Vitunac informed the Board that since Commissioner <br />Wheeler, who is chairman of the Tourist Development Council, <br />could not attend the City Council meeting tonight, he asked that <br />Attorney Vitunac attend to relate his concerns and try to clear <br />up any misunderstanding. Attorney Vitunac felt he needed author- <br />ity and direction from the full Board as to what they want him to <br />relate to the City tonight. He advised that it is Commissioner <br />Wheeler's belief it is in the best interests of the City and <br />County to pass this tax as there are a wealth of needs that can <br />be funded by this money however small the pot is. He apparently <br />is in favor of some sort of beach restoration but feels the <br />county's or city's share of the tax would be so small that for <br />the millions of dollars required for beach renourishment, it <br />would not generate any support to pass the tax and that, there- <br />fore, it would be better to use the tax for such things as <br />parking lots, beach walkovers, etc., to open up the beaches we <br />have or even acquire more beach property. He is not opposed to <br />the City of Vero Beach getting its share of the money to use as <br />they want; he is just opposed to using it for beach restoration <br />because he feels that would kill the whole issue. <br />43 AQGK � F���� 84 <br />JAN 6 198 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.