My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/13/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
1/13/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:17 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:26:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/13/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the homeowners to address their concerns about preserving the <br />quality of the neighborhood, and believed most of the property <br />owners left better informed about the concept of the project, <br />which is to build residences for people who want to live in a <br />single-family home without a large yard to maintain. The <br />exterior maintenance would be the responsibility of the <br />association, which would be run by the members. Unfortunately, <br />the P & Z Commission voted against the PRD for what he feels were <br />political reasons due to the outpouring of the residents in the <br />area. However, that Board did request that they come up with <br />some density PRD that would set the limits at no more than 2 <br />units per acre. Attorney Rabin stressed that the responsibility <br />of the Board is to serve the best interests of the county. <br />Attorney Rabin displayed the site plan of the PRD, but <br />Chairman Scurlock pointed out that Attorney Rabin had not <br />addressed the transportation element.` He wanted it on record <br />that when the County constructed 16th Street, Public Works <br />Director Jim Davis did not even want to design the road because <br />of the right-of-way restraints, and one of the main reasons the <br />Board rezoned the property to RS -3 instead of RS -6 in September, <br />1986, was due to the narrowness of the road. <br />County Attorney Vitunac noted that Ralmar has filed a <br />lawsuit since that time, and Attorney Rabin confirmed that a <br />lawsuit was filed, but noted that Attorney Vitunac was aware that <br />nothing had been done on that. He emphasized that they were not <br />trying to hide anything, and admitted that the developer has <br />moved ahead with a standard RS -3 subdivision which would be <br />called Queen's Terrace. He stated that this is not a threat by <br />Ralmar; it is a business decision by the developer. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked why they would want septic tanks in <br />that subdivision when County water and sewer are available. He <br />felt that Attorney Rabin was painting the worse possible scenario <br />for the tract subdivision. <br />39 <br />JA 1 � 1�7 BOOK 66 F�A�r.S <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.