Laserfiche WebLink
FEB �NF , <br />+, C , � i/ BOOK <br />there are any plans to solve this problem. He believed there <br />have been several accidents and wondered if this could be posted <br />prohibiting U-turns. <br />Mr. Henderson believed it would be necessary to have a <br />physical barrier to prevent U-turns, and Mr. Fowler stated that <br />they will look at this. <br />Director Keating noted that when this was going through site <br />plan, staff tried to get a connection between Vista Royale and <br />the shopping center which he felt would have resolved a lot of <br />problems, but it did not work out. <br />The Chairman thanked the DOT representatives for their <br />presentation and their cooperation. <br />APPROVAL OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BARRIER ISLAND ANALYSIS <br />Planning Director Keating reviewed the following memo: <br />TO: The Honorable Members p/tTEJanuary 22, 1987 FILE: <br />_of the Board of <br />County Commissioners <br />SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF INDIAN RIVER <br />COUNTY BARRIER ISLAND <br />ANALYSIS <br />Robert M. Keating, AICP"ee P4K Barrier Isl. Memo <br />FROM: planning & Development REFERENCES: IMBIRD <br />Director <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their <br />regular meeting of February 3, 1987. <br />DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS <br />The Hutchinson Island Resource Management Plan, approved by the <br />Governor and cabinet in December, 1983, required that all local <br />governments within the Hutchinson Island planning area under- <br />take certain actions. One such mandate was preparation and <br />adoption of a traffic impact study to ensure that road improve- <br />ments necessary to support planned barrier island development <br />would be programmed and implemented concurrent with that <br />development. <br />To comply with the mandate, Indian River County joined with the <br />barrier island municipalities in the County and incorporated <br />much of the required traffic analysis in the work program of <br />the consultant preparing -the County's traffic impact fee pro- <br />gram. Once the traffic study was prepared by the consultant, <br />there was a substantial delay prior to County receipt of the <br />consultant's supporting data and documentation. Then, the <br />County staff had to make substantial revisions to the consul- <br />tant's report, incorporating buildout data, expanding descrip- <br />20 <br />