Laserfiche WebLink
LAAR 10 1987 <br />Boa 67 ula 5SO <br />Attached is a memo from Lynn Williams that addresses the above <br />questions. <br />The staff recommendation remains the same, to award to the overall <br />low bidder All American Fire and Safety, Inc. <br />TO: Joe Baird DATE: January 26, 1987 FILE: <br />Director, OMB <br />SUBJECT' Fire Extinguishers <br />Bid #321 <br />L nn Williams <br />F OM: uperintendent REFERENCES: <br />Buildings & Grounds <br />The commission requested the following information during the <br />discussion of the referenced bid at the meeting of December 23, 1986. <br />1. Whether or not the bidders used new or recycled powder in the - <br />recharging of portable extinguishers. <br />2. The manufacturer or brand name of powder or material used in <br />recharging. <br />3. A further cost comparison of the bids. <br />4. A review of the specifications to ensure compliance with the <br />State Fire Marshall's rules. <br />Attached in the order listed above is the information to clarify <br />and/or substantiate the questions and concerns of the Commission. <br />Items 1 and 2 should be covered.by the statements provided by all <br />bidders, with the exception of American Safety Products, who included <br />theirs with the bid documents. <br />In addition to the statements attached, review of the Fire Code (NFPA <br />10) does not preclude the use of recycling the powder if collected in <br />an approved container, checked, and reinstalled. Vero Beach Fire <br />Equipment uses this procedure at the required six (6) year <br />maintenance inspection. <br />The attached cost comparison includes all bidders, and is for the <br />majority of extinguishers used by the county and theprojected <br />service required during the term of the bid. <br />I requested that Bob Hunt and Michael Grice of the South County Fire <br />District review our specifications as bid for compliance with the <br />State Fire Marshall's rules, Michael Grice's comments are attached. <br />The recommendation concerning award of this bid made in my memorandum <br />of December 8, 1986, remains as stated. <br />59 <br />