My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/10/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
3/10/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:17 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:46:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/10/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
chan in There is an unknown in th t th DOT <br />�s getting serious <br />about replacing the.Barber Bridge, and there is a possibility <br />they may construct a parallel bridge just north of the existing <br />bridge that may come along the north right-of-way Fine of the <br />Main Relief Canal. If that happens, it might result in having to <br />elevate the road to some extent. We have been communicating with <br />the DOT, but they are just in the beginning of the bridge study. <br />We hope, however, that our roadway will be constructed long <br />before they start any construction of a new bridge. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked if any residents of that area had <br />any questions this morning. <br />Margaret Stewart, 3027 Golf View Drive, advised that they <br />met with Jim Davis and several Boyle engineers in December and <br />talked about having two 8'x 5' culverts at the end of Golf View <br />Drive. However, in the report just out, there is no mention of <br />those culverts. As a matter of fact, they mention that at the <br />present time the impoundment owners are not allowing any openings <br />to the impoundment, and as a result, all new discharge structures <br />will have to be constructed differently so as to pass the flow <br />through to the canals without entering the impoundment. <br />Director Davis pointed out that Appendix A summarizes the <br />concerns of the residents discussed at the December meeting, but <br />does not specifically indicate the size of the structures to be <br />built there. The reason for that is that the consultants would <br />like to look at the entire watershed area from the FEC railroad <br />track eastward to the river and size those structures properly <br />and very conservatively. There is a commitment to build the <br />structures. <br />Mrs. Stewart asked if that means they still will have <br />culverts at the end of Golf View Drive, and Director Davis <br />explained that there will be a means to pick up the drainage from <br />Golf View Drive and bring it either into the project and divert <br />it to the canal, or bring it through the wetlands to the east. <br />64 BOOK 67 <br />MAR 10 '681 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.