4/14/1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOOK 68 PA -GE 64 MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, that the Board authorize transmittal of the proposal to the State for a 90 -day review, with the understanding that in the meantime, after receiving further traffic data, full consideration would be given to all alternatives. Under discussion, Commissioner Bird explained that he seconded the Motion because he feels that the property owner has the right to use his property at the highest and best use if it does not negatively impact the surrounding property. From what he has heard today, he does not feel that the negatives offset the benefits, and believed we have a unique situation here and an ability to tie a fragmented piece of property together that holds more threat to the residents in the area in its fragmented condition than it does in a consolidated development. Further, during the time the proposal is in Tallahassee, the County can establish a vehicle to allow site plans and zoning to be considered in tandem. Commissioner Bird stated that he owns a multiple -family unit in that area and the value has gone down in the last few years because there is a glut of multiple -family units available. He felt the proposed Promenade done with the proper restrictions with agreements would really be in the best interests of everyone concerned. Commissioner Wheeler asked for clarification on what is included in the recommendation that we would be sending to the State, and Commissioner Eggert explained that we are simply approving transmittal. Director Keating advised that if transmittal is approved, the proposal would be sent to Tallahassee with the backup material included in today's Agenda. Chairman Scurlock admitted that since this issue first came up, he has been on both sides and in between. He felt the Promenade is a very positive concept. In fact, he encouraged the I 64