My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/23/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
6/23/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:19 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:39:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/23/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E7 <br />in that area, determine if this property is appropriate for the <br />plant, retention, etc., determine if there is a reasonable use <br />and if the price is in the right range. <br />Commissioner Eggert asked if use of the property for a well - <br />field site could be considered adequate reason, and Chairman <br />Scurlock felt Utilities would have to make that determination. <br />Discussion ensued regarding going to the deep aquifer, and <br />Commissioner Bird felt if we go to the deep aquifer for our <br />wellfields, we do not necessarily need that particular piece of <br />land. <br />The Chairman believed if the property were to be used for <br />the retention area, it might be more compatible to preserving the <br />plantlife, and discussion continued at length as to doing an <br />analysis and seeing if we can fit this into our -master plan on a <br />cost effective basis. <br />Commissioner Bowman.noted that we have been talking about <br />buying riverfront property and sand ridge, and did not see why we <br />can't.package all this in a G.O. bond and take it to the public. <br />It was pointed out that this would require considerable <br />time, and this property will not be available in a year. <br />Commissioner Bowman felt as far as the sand ridge is con- <br />cerned, it is now or never. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked how much money we have in our fund <br />where we collect monies for tree protection and beach accesses. <br />OMB Director Baird advised there is about $24,000 in the <br />Tree Ordinance fund, and the Park Development fund has about <br />$130,000, but that is proposed to be used for development of <br />Golden Sands Park. <br />Administrator Balczun reported that staff has been thinking <br />about applying the $24,000 to the purchase of the 100' of <br />beachfront property offered us by the Lowenstein Estate, which <br />staff has been negotiating for at the Board's direction, and will <br />soon bring back to the Board. <br />49 BOCK �� F,i�E 64 3 <br />L_ <br />JUN 2 3 �7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.