My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/14/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
7/14/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2020 2:29:24 PM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:42:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/14/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUL 14-1987, Boor �E <br />what action they want from this Board. Are they asking for an <br />extension of their old franchise or not? <br />Attorney Sundstrom stated they have never requested it. <br />They are here because they were asked to be here and address this <br />Board, and they are grateful for the opportunity to do so. <br />Commissioner Eggert wished to know what is "left alone" - <br />does it mean continued non-compliance with the current franchise, <br />and they are out there with nothing? <br />Attorney Sundstrom reiterated that he was not sure they <br />need a franchise and did not believe they have one. He felt all <br />parties agree that none exists today. <br />Commissioner Bird asked Director Pinto if they were to <br />comply with the old franchise, is that something we could live <br />with and allow them to continue to operate. <br />Director Pinto believed staff has made a recommendation <br />based on what they feel the needs of the county are to protect <br />the interests of the people they are serving. He did not quite <br />understand Attorney Sundstrom saying they want to be unregulated <br />or they don't need a franchise. Mr. Pinto believed they have to <br />be regulated under the Special Act for this county to regulate <br />franchises. <br />Commissioner Wheeler believed what he is.hearing is that <br />Bent Pine actually needs a franchise and they are going to go to <br />court to determine if they need one or not. He is trying to <br />understand, but he could not foresee any settlement if they do <br />not want a franchise and we are not willing to have a utility <br />without a franchise. <br />Attorney Sundstrom explained that they are in doubt, and if <br />this Board would meet with his client in a non -emotion charged <br />atmosphere and work out how they can live together, they are <br />willing to do that, but not if staff's position is that "we are <br />going to get this system for nothing." <br />Attorney Vitunac emphasized that we are here today to extend <br />the franchise under the same conditions.they have had for seven <br />Y 60 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.