Laserfiche WebLink
4UL 21 1987 BOOK (,�"E 890 <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bowman, that the Board authorize staff to <br />advertise a public hearing to reconsider the entire <br />ordinance on home occupational uses in the ROSE -4 <br />District. <br />Commissioner Bowman did not feel another public hearing was <br />necessary if we took Alternative #3, which would provide a 90 -day <br />period to allow all existing businesses to obtain an occupational <br />license. <br />Chairman Scurlock felt we need to reconsider the whole issue <br />and notify everyone of the scheduled meeting. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion <br />was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />Lena Marshall suggested that items c & d be deleted from <br />the grandfather clause in Ordinance 87-22. The residents are not <br />opposed to existing businesses, just to any additional businesses <br />being grandfathered. While they would prefer not to have any of <br />the existing businesses, they realize a few may have to be <br />grandfathered in. She urged the Board not to encourage more <br />illegal businesses to come forth and be grandfathered in. She <br />felt that they might have to deal with the metal casing business <br />- and the lawn mower service, but objected to the contractor's <br />office owned by Fred Mensing and the service businesses. In <br />addition, she believed that some misrepresentation was made on <br />February 24th by Attorney O'Haire on behalf of Fred Mensing <br />regarding the existing home occupations, and pointed out that <br />Attorney O'Haire even admitted that he drafted a part of the <br />ordinance that appears to be geared in favor of Fred Mensing's <br />contractor's office. <br />The Commissioners felt that all these arguments should be <br />made -at the public hearing, and directed staff to schedule an <br />48 <br />