10/13/1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

OCT 13 Book 69 : PAGE 670 Director Pinto advised that there is another aspect to be considered that is outside of franchising, and it has nothing to do with the rates. This is that there is going to have to be a permit established to collect anything in the county that is going to come through the Landfill gates so we can identify where the trash is coming from and also whether or not the vehicle meets the criteria to run around the county collecting. Commissioner Eggert suggested a Motion to table until we can get a study on residential and commercial needs from Camp, Dresser & McKee. Chairman Scurlock asked Attorney Vitunac if it is in order to table before we open the public hearing, and Attorney Vitunac stated that if the Board is not going to grant any permits today, it is not necessary to go through the public hearing if the Board doesn't wish to. Commissioner Wheeler felt the purpose of the public hearing is to weigh both sides before we make a decision, and Commis- sioner Eggert stated that her reason to table is that she feels we need the other information in order to make a decision. Commissioner Bird felt it would be premature for both the applicants and the Board to have a presentation today before we have more information. Discussion continued in regard to the present franchise, which Commissioner Eggert felt was very loosely written. She stressed that she does want to be fair about this and would prefer to table further consideration until we can have more complete information from our consultant. this. Commissioner Bird agreed that we need an independent look at Director Pinto suggested that he be allowed to talk with the consultant and then come back to the Board next Tuesday with a time schedule. He also felt another important aspect to be considered at the same time is that we need a legal opinion from 28 � s r