Laserfiche WebLink
Q <br />BOOK 69 Pr- AGE O? 9 . <br />OCT 271987 <br />Existing Land Use Pattern <br />The subject property consists of undeveloped land, a church, and <br />several single-family dwellings zoned RS -3. North of the subject <br />property, across North Winter Beach Road, are single-family <br />dwellings and undeveloped land zoned RM -6, a plant nursery zoned <br />RS -3, and undeveloped land zoned IL. Further east is the F.E.C. <br />railroad. South of the subject property, across South Winter <br />Beach Road, is undeveloped land zoned A-1, a church and <br />undeveloped land zoned RS -6, undeveloped land zoned RM -6 and IL, <br />and two industrial buildings zoned IL. West of the subject <br />property, across the Lateral "G" Canal, are single-family <br />residences and undeveloped land zoned RS -3. <br />Future Land Use Pattern <br />The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property and the <br />land south and immediately east of it as LD -2, Low -Density <br />Residential 2 (up to 6 units/acre). Further to the east is the <br />100 acre South Winter Beach Road Industrial node and the U.S. #1 <br />MXD, Mixed -Use Corridor (up to 6 units/acre). The land north and <br />west of the subject property is designated as LD -1, Low -Density <br />Residential 1 (up to 3 units/acre). - <br />The Winter Beach Precise Land Use Map, as amended by the Board of <br />County Commissioners on July 23, 1986, designates the subject <br />property as LD -1 with an appropriate zoning of RS -3. <br />It is staff's opinion and consistently has been staff's opinion <br />that the current LD -2 land use designation is appropriate for <br />this property. The RS -3 zoning in place on the subject property <br />is consistent with the land use designation, and a change in land <br />use designation is not required for control of density in this <br />area for the immediate future. This is due to the fact that <br />several other control methods are available, including rezonings, <br />and state environmental controls. <br />There are a number of reasons why the 'staff has consistently <br />recommended that the_LD-2 designation remain in place. One is <br />that the County's growth has been in a linear pattern. The major <br />growth and higher population densities in the county have occured <br />parallel to the U.S. 1 corridor. Development along this. corridor <br />has occured due to the proximity of the area to major service <br />areas and transportation access. This pattern of higher density <br />in the eastern part of the County and lower densities to the west <br />is reflected.in the County's Comprehensive Plan and is encouraged <br />to continue. This is consistent with the County's objective to <br />have a more compact development pattern, a system which permits <br />more efficient provision of urban services, and avoids the <br />complications of urban sprall. <br />With the future projected growth rates for Indian River County, <br />staff anticipates intense growth pressures. Eventually these <br />growth pressures will require additional lands to be developed at <br />higher densities in areas where urban services are available. <br />According the the Comprehensive Plan, the Winter Beach area lies <br />within an urban service area scheduled for development between <br />the year 1991-2000. However, the Utilities Division anticipates <br />having a water treatment plant in the Hobart Park area on line <br />within the next two years and, with the soon to be expanded <br />Gifford plant, this proposed time frame will probably be changed <br />to a less distant period, such as 1988-90. <br />In addition to urban services, the. Winter Beach area has a good <br />transportation network, being accessible to two main east/west <br />collector roads. These roads are capable of carrying a large <br />volume of traffic through the north county area and linking this <br />area to major north/south roads such as Kings Highway. This <br />linkage also enables the area to be highly accessable to the <br />remainder of the County. <br />56 <br />