My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/27/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
10/27/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:21 AM
Creation date
6/4/2015 4:50:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/27/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to show up because the vote would be 3 to 1. Mr. Proctor <br />expressed his belief that LD -2 or 6 units per acre is one of the <br />best zonings you can get for something like this property. He <br />personally would be glad to have his developed at 2 upa, but felt <br />it would not be fair to those people who own the other property <br />who don't understand why they can't get the zoning that has been <br />recommended over and over. Mr. Proctor understood that at one <br />time the County Commission voted unanimously to go along with the <br />LD -2 and then reversed itself. <br />Chairman Scurlock did not remember anything about this that <br />has ever been unanimous, and Director Keating believed at one <br />meeting there was a compromise about the land west of the canal <br />being 3 upa and the land we are currently considering would be 6 <br />upa. <br />Mr. Proctor felt the residents would-be better off with a <br />buffer between the single family residents and the small <br />apartments down on South Winter Beach Road right next to the <br />industrial complex and over next to the railroad tracks. While <br />he realized the decision is up to the Commission, he felt to go <br />directly against the P&Z Commission in this one instance when <br />they have gone along with all the rest, did not seem fair. <br />Commissioner Eggert pointed out that the Winter Beach Small <br />Area Plan adopted for this area calls for LD -1 and RS -3. <br />Attorney Sam Block came before the Board representing the <br />Winter Beach Progressive League and confirmed that the Small Area <br />Plan was adopted in 1985 at LD -1 and RS -3. He felt the <br />Commission has been consistent in their actions. He further <br />wished to point out that when the Comprehensive Plan was adopted <br />in 1982, it was said that it was done as a broad sweep, and <br />Planning at the time said they then would need to go into <br />particular areas and do small area plans. Attorney Block felt <br />this is a logical conclusion of what has happened over the last <br />few years as related to the character of the neighborhood. As to <br />this being <br />an urban service area, that <br />is not why the <br />people <br />OCT 2 7.1987 <br />L <br />59 <br />RUCK <br />69 F'AGr 8.32. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.