12/22/1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

realistic. They asked repeatedly for time extensions and were denied time and again. Commissioner Wheeler informed the Board that the committee has gone through this again and again, and last month sat down with Mr. Schopke and the architect and agreed to bury everything prior to November 9th. He, therefore, was not interested in hearing anything that occurred prior to that date. Mr. Schopke agreed that was correct, but he had had felt the rest of the Commission were unaware of all this. He then stated that they did deliver the materials they said they would deliver on the date that was set and they have been working feverishly since then to get them on line. They had a problem with the intercom system that even the Dukane people could not identify for sometime. It was delivered and put on line and kept going down, but they finally got it worked out. Their sub- contractor pushed a little too hard for substantial completion last week, and it all just came apart at the inspection. Mr. Schopke contended that even if they were complete right now, the county couldn't use the building because the county's site work is not completed. Attorney Vitunac believed that was waiting until we could have access without everything being trampled. Administrator Balczun, for purposes of the record, advised that the county is in total control of when it pulls the trigger to do the site work. If the Board wants it done in five minutes, we will start in five minutes; so he felt that is a moot point and should not be debated. Mr. Schopke argued that there is some time involved because they cannot get the county in the building until that work is completed, and he is talking about retention ponds and roads, which do not have anything to do with electronics. Owner's Representative "Sonny" Dean reported that the county has been working on site work for the past 30 days, and he did not know what specific area Mr. Schopke is alluding to. The only DEC 4 2.19 7 85 mor 70 F.�� M