My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/5/1988
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1988
>
01/5/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:15:40 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:00:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/05/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JAN. 5 I988 , <br />BOOK . 70 PAGE 475 <br />perform design services for miscellaneous projects with a construction cost <br />of less than $500,000. Eleven firms submitted letters of interest. A list <br />of the firms is attached. The Selection Committee, appointed by the County <br />Administrator, met on Dec. 17, 1987, and recommended that a continuing <br />services contract be prepared with all of the following firms: <br />Peterson & Votapka - Vero Beach <br />Lloyd & Associates - Vero Beach <br />Finley -Horn & Assoc. - Vero Beach <br />Carter Associates, Inc. - Vero Beach. <br />Coastal Tech, Inc. - Vero Beach <br />Projects would be assigned to each consultant on a work order and be <br />presented to the Board for approval. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />The alternatives presented include: <br />1) Proceeding with continuing contracts for Engineering Services. <br />2) Advertising individually for all projects. <br />Staff prefers the first alternative. Many counties and cities are entering <br />into continuing contracts to save time and the cost of publically <br />advertising. <br />RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING <br />Staff recommends entering into a Continuing Services Agreement with the <br />above mentioned firms. No funding is being considered at this time. <br />Finding will be addressed when individual work orders are prepared. <br />Commissioner Bird asked how we determine which of these <br />firms we will use for a particular project and what the fee <br />schedule will be, and Public Works Director Jim Davis explained <br />that when a particular job comes up, staff writes a memo to the <br />Board requesting authorization to issue a work order under a <br />master agreement for the company to proceed. When a substantial <br />size job comes in, we review the list and pick the proper <br />engineer for the job at the best dollar value. The Selection <br />Committee is comprised of himself and either Engineers Mike Orr <br />or Ralph Brescia. While they try to spread the work around <br />equitably, the selection is not a strict rotation, because he <br />felt that some engineers in town may have better capabilities for <br />one type of job as opposed to another. <br />Commissioner Bird understood then that what we are doing <br />today is prequalifying these firms on an individual basis, and <br />that staff will make a recommendation to the Board on which firm <br />to use for each job. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.