My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/26/1988
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1988
>
1/26/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:19:10 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:03:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/26/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PP - <br />JAN 26 1988 <br />BOOK 7® F,[670 <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0, <br />Commissioner Bowman being temporarily delayed), <br />approved Budget Amendment No. 020, as recommended <br />by staff. <br />T0: Members of the Board <br />of County Commissioners, <br />FROM: Joseph A. Baird. OMB Director <br />THROUGH: <br />SUBJECT: BUDGET AMENDMENT <br />NUMBER: <br />DATE: <br />020 <br />January 18, 1988 <br />Entry Number <br />Fund/Department/Account Name <br />Account Number <br />Increase <br />Decrease <br />1. <br />GF/Cash Forward -October 1st <br />Other Impr. <br />GF/Blda.&Grounds/Except Bldg. <br />001-000-389-040.00 <br />001-220-519-066.39 <br />$6,794.00 <br />$6,794.00 <br />F. FmHA Contract Amendment for Engineering Services <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/15/88: <br />TO: CHARLES BALCZUN <br />COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR <br />THRU: TERRANCE G. PINTO <br />DIRECTOR OF UTIL'RVICESS3 <br />FROM: JEFFREY K. BARTON <br />ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES <br />SUBJECT: FmHA CONTRACT AMENDMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES <br />DATE: JANUARY 15, 1988 <br />BACKGROUND <br />In the original budget allocation for the Gifford Area Sewer <br />Project, $100,000.00 was allocated for additional engineering <br />services i.e., surveying, outside engineering consultants, aerial <br />photography, etc. The $100,000.00 should have been sufficient to <br />cover these requirements until a protest was filed by Bent Pine <br />Utilities during the permitting stage of the project. At this <br />point, several outside engineering consultants needed to be hired to <br />present expert testimony before the Department of Environmental <br />Regulations Hearing Board. These costs were not anticipated when <br />the original budget was formulated. <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.