Laserfiche WebLink
point where they need to be hospitalized. He then discussed <br />items of change in Pod "D" from the original Pod "B"; i.e., <br />changing the angle of the walls to give better sight lines into <br />cells and redesigning the central control officers' station to <br />make it a smaller room and cut the staffing positions needed, <br />personnel being one of the biggest costs. He advised they will <br />be utilizing the existing exercise yard and are proposing <br />revision to one quadrant of the pod so they can house more and <br />varied classifications of women within the same pod area. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked if the acoustical problem is solved <br />now, and Mr. Silver stated that it will be handled as they get <br />into the more finite designs. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked if the reason we had this problem in <br />the first place was due to a design defect. <br />Mr. Disney reported that he determined in going through the <br />original designs that the acoustics had been addressed, but then <br />in a cost-cutting measure, the sheet vinyl flooring was taken out <br />and we went to a concrete flooring which increased the bounce and <br />consequently the acoustic problem. Mr. Disney informed the Board <br />that the acoustic requirements under 33-8 are simply a statement <br />that says "normal to human habitation," and the D.O.C. could not <br />even define that for them. The acoustic controls in Phase 1 have <br />been adequate in other areas of similar facilities with the sheet <br />vinyl flooring. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked if that particular rule has been <br />challenged, or if it even is a rule? <br />Mr. Disney could not answer that. He agreed that there is a <br />noise problem, but that noise can be reduced by softer flooring, <br />and this is just one solution that was investigated and given to <br />Mr. Dean. <br />Mr. Silver commented re the acoustic question that it is his <br />understanding that a part of the cost of that retrofit was due to <br />the fact that they had to be operating within an occupied <br />31 <br />L...I.LIPR 121988 <br />Bou 72 FA E 31 <br />