Laserfiche WebLink
also talked about the provision for contact visitation and non - <br />contact visitation and controls. <br />Commissioner Eggert inquired about access for someone <br />visiting in a wheelchair and was advised that they would go by <br />the corridor to the central elevator. <br />Commissioner Bird wished to know if we approve this plan and <br />Frizzell goes ahead with the design and the county then pays them <br />for the design, who owns the plans? <br />Mr. Silver advised that the county will have as -built <br />documents, but legally the tracings belong to the professional. <br />The county would not be licensed or permitted to serve as an <br />architect or an engineer. <br />Chairman Scurlock believed there are some utility questions <br />that need to be addressed. <br />Utilities Director Pinto informed the Board that we are <br />experiencing a major problem with grease and all kind of things <br />coming through the utility system from the jail and are presently <br />in the design of putting in a grinder unit. If the plan includes <br />relocation of a kitchen, we do not want to install something that <br />could be circumvented by any plumbing changes. Director Pinto <br />noted that the original design did a nice job of putting in a <br />grease trap that was subsequently by-passed by the kitchen, and <br />he is concerned because the major problem in our Gifford system <br />now is that jail. <br />Mr. Disney advised that the problem of the grease trap was <br />brought to his attention about six months ago. He investigated <br />the schematics of the original document as well as the as -built <br />drawings, and it appears the installation by-passed the grease <br />trap in contradiction to the drawings. As he understood it, <br />this was because of a local Building Department requirement that <br />we "safe -waste" a particular sink. He believed this has been <br />corrected. <br />33 <br />APR 12 1988 <br />'h._ <br />BOOK 72 ME. 33 <br />