My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/27/1988
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1988
>
4/27/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:48:04 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:15:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/27/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
lakes should be deeper rather than shallower. He admitted that <br />water quality is always a consideration, but whether you like it <br />or not, Mother Nature will control what vegetation will grow <br />there. Mr. Kreitman had some very serious problems about the <br />depth limitation with regard to the littoral zone, but stated <br />that his opinions are his own. One of his main concerns is that <br />such a lake will attract children and there is a danger of a <br />child falling in and becoming entangled in underwater growth. <br />Mr. Kreitman felt that when we consider the littoral zone, we <br />must first determine what vegetation will grow there. That needs <br />to be studied and justified to some greater extent. <br />Chairman Scurlock believed that subject was covered pretty <br />thoroughly during the meeting of March 22, 1988. <br />Commissioner Bird appreciated Mr. Kreitman's expertise and <br />opinions in this matter, but felt that this ordinance has to be <br />what is generally accepted and cannot be that specific. <br />Mr. Kreitman concluded his presentation by reiterating that <br />some parts of the ordinance are vague and arbitrary and some are <br />too detailed. He, therefore, felt that it has not been shown <br />that this ordinance is reasonable, and believed it still needs <br />significant work. <br />Dr. Henry Fischer of Sebastian felt that the 25 -ft. average <br />- <br />mean figure is a type of voodobconservation since the sand ridge <br />is not the primary recharger in Indian River County, as commonly <br />believed. The primary recharger in this county is to the <br />northwest, and he believed the County should be purchasing and <br />preserving hundreds of acres in that area, instead of requiring <br />trees to be planted on the sand ridge. <br />Mr. Kreitman backed up Dr. Fischer's statement about the <br />primary recharger. <br />Commissioner Bowman asked to which aquifer Mr. Kreitman was <br />referring, the shallow or the deep, and Mr. Kreitman answered <br />that it was the Ocala/Orlando aquifer. <br />4 <br />APR 271988 <br />No F I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.