5/17/1988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

staff's opinion that these have not been adequately ad- dressed. Although the applicant agreed verbally during the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of March 24, 1988 to comply with some of the noted deficiencies, no revised plans have been submitted to reflect these changes. With regards to requirements a,b,c, and d, the applicant has noted on the plans the activities which will take place within the proposed warehouse and shop facilities. More specifically, the uses proposed in the application include "storage, manufacturing, electrical, plumbing, harv, general contracting services, repairs and sales". In staff's opinion the manufacturing, repairs and sales activities are not expressly permitted under 15(b)4 of the zoning code as permitted home occupational uses within the ROSE -4 district. Staff requested that the applicant demonstrate conformance with the requirements of (e)1 (shown above), by providing a statement identifying, by name, all family members living within the residence, and all employees who are currently employed with the business. The applicant has failed to provide this information; therefore, the application has not met this requirement. In addition, staff believes that an additional 5,600 sq. ft. of warehouse and shop area would increase production/storage capacity and enable the applicant to expand the number of employees who work there; therefore, an expansion of this magnitude is not in compliance with the requirements of (e)1. Requirement (e)2 prohibits the sale of products to the general public and from the premises except as otherwise ,provided. Staff requested that the applicant submit a notarized statement that products are not offered for retail sale to the general public and to this date staff has not received any such statement. The applicant's response indicates that retail sales do occur from time to time. Pursuant to State HRS regulations, concerning minimum allowable lot sizes, when an individual lot is to be served by well and septic tanks, any newly created lot must have at least ±} acre of -ea. With this in mind the applicant could expect and would only oe allowed to develop the 1.79 acres into possibly 4 individual parcels. Requirement (e)4 sets forth the criterion that traffic shall not be generated in excess of that customary for residential uses. The County's Traffic Engineer has estimated .that normal residen- tial uses on this site would generate ±29 ADT. Size of Lot - 1.79 acres Allowable density.1 unit/1 acre Possible density - 4 units 7.24 te per unit x 4 units = ±29 ADT ADT = Average Daily Trips te = trip ends A light industrial warehouse use, with ±7,100 sq. ft., would generate ± 50 ADT Existing building = 1,515 sq. ft. Proposed building = 5,600 sq. ft. Total building = 7,115 sq. ft. 7.0 te per 1,000 sq. ft. - ± 50 ADT MAY �.'r 4b6 26 BOOK 72 F'AGE 369