My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/17/1988
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1988
>
5/17/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:51:50 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:17:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/17/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
staff's opinion that these have not been adequately ad- <br />dressed. Although the applicant agreed verbally during the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of March 24, 1988 <br />to comply with some of the noted deficiencies, no revised <br />plans have been submitted to reflect these changes. <br />With regards to requirements a,b,c, and d, the applicant has <br />noted on the plans the activities which will take place <br />within the proposed warehouse and shop facilities. More <br />specifically, the uses proposed in the application include <br />"storage, manufacturing, electrical, plumbing, harv, general <br />contracting services, repairs and sales". In staff's opinion <br />the manufacturing, repairs and sales activities are not <br />expressly permitted under 15(b)4 of the zoning code as <br />permitted home occupational uses within the ROSE -4 district. <br />Staff requested that the applicant demonstrate conformance <br />with the requirements of (e)1 (shown above), by providing a <br />statement identifying, by name, all family members living <br />within the residence, and all employees who are currently <br />employed with the business. The applicant has failed to <br />provide this information; therefore, the application has not <br />met this requirement. In addition, staff believes that an <br />additional 5,600 sq. ft. of warehouse and shop area would <br />increase production/storage capacity and enable the applicant <br />to expand the number of employees who work there; therefore, <br />an expansion of this magnitude is not in compliance with the <br />requirements of (e)1. <br />Requirement (e)2 prohibits the sale of products to the <br />general public and from the premises except as otherwise <br />,provided. Staff requested that the applicant submit a <br />notarized statement that products are not offered for retail <br />sale to the general public and to this date staff has not <br />received any such statement. The applicant's response <br />indicates that retail sales do occur from time to time. <br />Pursuant to State HRS regulations, concerning minimum allowable <br />lot sizes, when an individual lot is to be served by well and <br />septic tanks, any newly created lot must have at least ±} acre of <br />-ea. With this in mind the applicant could expect and would only <br />oe allowed to develop the 1.79 acres into possibly 4 individual <br />parcels. <br />Requirement (e)4 sets forth the criterion that traffic shall not <br />be generated in excess of that customary for residential uses. <br />The County's Traffic Engineer has estimated .that normal residen- <br />tial uses on this site would generate ±29 ADT. <br />Size of Lot - 1.79 acres <br />Allowable density.1 unit/1 acre <br />Possible density - 4 units <br />7.24 te per unit x 4 units = ±29 ADT <br />ADT = Average Daily Trips <br />te = trip ends <br />A light industrial warehouse use, with ±7,100 sq. ft., would <br />generate ± 50 ADT <br />Existing building = 1,515 sq. ft. <br />Proposed building = 5,600 sq. ft. <br />Total building = 7,115 sq. ft. <br />7.0 te per 1,000 sq. ft. - ± 50 ADT <br />MAY �.'r 4b6 <br />26 <br />BOOK 72 F'AGE 369 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.