My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/12/1988
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1988
>
7/12/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:00:10 PM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:22:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/12/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r � r <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved <br />the professional engineering services agreement with <br />Glace and Radcliffe, Inc. for Phase IV Extension of <br />Indian River Boulevard, and authorized the Chairman's <br />signature, as recommended by staff. <br />AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />ENGINEERING FIRM SELECTION —WATER TREATMENT AND WASTEWATER <br />EFFLUENT DISPOSAL <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/30/88: <br />TO: CHARLES P. BALCZUN <br />COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR <br />THRU: TERRANCE G. PIN <br />DIRECTOR OF UTILI SERVICES <br />FROM: WILLIAM F. MCCAIN '-'� <br />PROJECT ENGINEER9' <br />DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES <br />SUBJECT: ENGINEERING FIRM SELECTION <br />BACKGROUND <br />DATE: JUNE 30, 1988 <br />Several months ago the Department of Utility Services began hearing <br />presentations from various engineering consulting firms in two areas <br />of service. The areas of interest are water treatment and <br />wastewater effluent disposal. Three firms made presentations in <br />both respective areas, for water treatment the firms were: <br />1. Camp, Dresser and McKee <br />2. Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jernigan <br />3. DSS Engineers Inc. <br />For effluent disposal the firms were: <br />1. Camp, Dresser and McKee <br />2. Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jernigan <br />3. Dyer, Riddle, Mills & Precourt <br />ANALYSIS <br />The purpose of these presentations was to rank the firms in the <br />order in which they would be used ie., firm number one to be <br />contacted first, then if a satisfactory contract for the needed work <br />could not be achieved, firms ranked number two and three would be <br />contacted for negotiations. <br />30 <br />BOOK 73 r � 936 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.